<code id='3C527886CF'></code><style id='3C527886CF'></style>
    • <acronym id='3C527886CF'></acronym>
      <center id='3C527886CF'><center id='3C527886CF'><tfoot id='3C527886CF'></tfoot></center><abbr id='3C527886CF'><dir id='3C527886CF'><tfoot id='3C527886CF'></tfoot><noframes id='3C527886CF'>

    • <optgroup id='3C527886CF'><strike id='3C527886CF'><sup id='3C527886CF'></sup></strike><code id='3C527886CF'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='3C527886CF'><label id='3C527886CF'><select id='3C527886CF'><dt id='3C527886CF'><span id='3C527886CF'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='3C527886CF'></u>
          <i id='3C527886CF'><strike id='3C527886CF'><tt id='3C527886CF'><pre id='3C527886CF'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          Wikipedia