<code id='317F125E84'></code><style id='317F125E84'></style>
    • <acronym id='317F125E84'></acronym>
      <center id='317F125E84'><center id='317F125E84'><tfoot id='317F125E84'></tfoot></center><abbr id='317F125E84'><dir id='317F125E84'><tfoot id='317F125E84'></tfoot><noframes id='317F125E84'>

    • <optgroup id='317F125E84'><strike id='317F125E84'><sup id='317F125E84'></sup></strike><code id='317F125E84'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='317F125E84'><label id='317F125E84'><select id='317F125E84'><dt id='317F125E84'><span id='317F125E84'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='317F125E84'></u>
          <i id='317F125E84'><strike id='317F125E84'><tt id='317F125E84'><pre id='317F125E84'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          hotspot