<code id='558634AE79'></code><style id='558634AE79'></style>
    • <acronym id='558634AE79'></acronym>
      <center id='558634AE79'><center id='558634AE79'><tfoot id='558634AE79'></tfoot></center><abbr id='558634AE79'><dir id='558634AE79'><tfoot id='558634AE79'></tfoot><noframes id='558634AE79'>

    • <optgroup id='558634AE79'><strike id='558634AE79'><sup id='558634AE79'></sup></strike><code id='558634AE79'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='558634AE79'><label id='558634AE79'><select id='558634AE79'><dt id='558634AE79'><span id='558634AE79'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='558634AE79'></u>
          <i id='558634AE79'><strike id='558634AE79'><tt id='558634AE79'><pre id='558634AE79'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          1:03Former President Donald Trump speaks before he boards his plane at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Aug. 3, 2023, in Arlington, Va., after facing a judge on federal conspiracy charges that allege he conspired to subvert the 2020 election.Alex Brandon/AP

          Special counsel Jack Smith obtained a search warrant for records and data from former President Donald Trump's Twitter account earlier this year, newly revealed court documents show.

          The existence of the search warrant was confirmed in a new order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which has upheld a $350,000 fine against Twitter imposed by a judge in D.C. District Court that found the company in contempt for initially failing to comply with the warrant.

          This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          hotspot