<code id='DCEB10DD89'></code><style id='DCEB10DD89'></style>
    • <acronym id='DCEB10DD89'></acronym>
      <center id='DCEB10DD89'><center id='DCEB10DD89'><tfoot id='DCEB10DD89'></tfoot></center><abbr id='DCEB10DD89'><dir id='DCEB10DD89'><tfoot id='DCEB10DD89'></tfoot><noframes id='DCEB10DD89'>

    • <optgroup id='DCEB10DD89'><strike id='DCEB10DD89'><sup id='DCEB10DD89'></sup></strike><code id='DCEB10DD89'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='DCEB10DD89'><label id='DCEB10DD89'><select id='DCEB10DD89'><dt id='DCEB10DD89'><span id='DCEB10DD89'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='DCEB10DD89'></u>
          <i id='DCEB10DD89'><strike id='DCEB10DD89'><tt id='DCEB10DD89'><pre id='DCEB10DD89'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          fashion