<code id='378839AE70'></code><style id='378839AE70'></style>
    • <acronym id='378839AE70'></acronym>
      <center id='378839AE70'><center id='378839AE70'><tfoot id='378839AE70'></tfoot></center><abbr id='378839AE70'><dir id='378839AE70'><tfoot id='378839AE70'></tfoot><noframes id='378839AE70'>

    • <optgroup id='378839AE70'><strike id='378839AE70'><sup id='378839AE70'></sup></strike><code id='378839AE70'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='378839AE70'><label id='378839AE70'><select id='378839AE70'><dt id='378839AE70'><span id='378839AE70'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='378839AE70'></u>
          <i id='378839AE70'><strike id='378839AE70'><tt id='378839AE70'><pre id='378839AE70'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          comprehensive