<code id='787C124BF5'></code><style id='787C124BF5'></style>
    • <acronym id='787C124BF5'></acronym>
      <center id='787C124BF5'><center id='787C124BF5'><tfoot id='787C124BF5'></tfoot></center><abbr id='787C124BF5'><dir id='787C124BF5'><tfoot id='787C124BF5'></tfoot><noframes id='787C124BF5'>

    • <optgroup id='787C124BF5'><strike id='787C124BF5'><sup id='787C124BF5'></sup></strike><code id='787C124BF5'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='787C124BF5'><label id='787C124BF5'><select id='787C124BF5'><dt id='787C124BF5'><span id='787C124BF5'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='787C124BF5'></u>
          <i id='787C124BF5'><strike id='787C124BF5'><tt id='787C124BF5'><pre id='787C124BF5'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          Wikipedia