<code id='877DBA30C4'></code><style id='877DBA30C4'></style>
    • <acronym id='877DBA30C4'></acronym>
      <center id='877DBA30C4'><center id='877DBA30C4'><tfoot id='877DBA30C4'></tfoot></center><abbr id='877DBA30C4'><dir id='877DBA30C4'><tfoot id='877DBA30C4'></tfoot><noframes id='877DBA30C4'>

    • <optgroup id='877DBA30C4'><strike id='877DBA30C4'><sup id='877DBA30C4'></sup></strike><code id='877DBA30C4'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='877DBA30C4'><label id='877DBA30C4'><select id='877DBA30C4'><dt id='877DBA30C4'><span id='877DBA30C4'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='877DBA30C4'></u>
          <i id='877DBA30C4'><strike id='877DBA30C4'><tt id='877DBA30C4'><pre id='877DBA30C4'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          A heart monitoring watch, referred as Project Zero 2.0 is displayed in the Omron Healthcare booth during a press event – health tech coverage from STAT
          Digital tools to better track blood pressure over time and encourage adherence to treatment plans are increasingly commonplace. David Becker/Getty Images

          If you have high blood pressure, it’s increasingly likely that your doctor or your insurer will offer you a blood pressure cuff or an educational app to help you get it under control. While potentially impactful, these tools may not be reaching marginalized people who don’t regularly have access to good health care — and who may benefit the most from the tools.

          A new analysis suggests that there ought to be more investment in novel hypertension programs for people experiencing health disparities.The meta-review of 28 studies of digital health interventions for people of color and low-income patients found that as a whole participants saw a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in average systolic blood pressure compared to control groups. In total, the analysis included more than 8,000 participants; most of the studies followed participants for six or 12 months. The results, published Wednesday in JAMA Network Open, are consistent with studies of digital tools in the general population.

          advertisement

          Joseph Ebinger, of the Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles, who was not involved in the study, said it provides needed evidence that “there are tools that exist to be able to help meet individuals where they are in the world, and they should be utilized more heavily.”

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          Wikipedia