<code id='7ACCC22BF1'></code><style id='7ACCC22BF1'></style>
    • <acronym id='7ACCC22BF1'></acronym>
      <center id='7ACCC22BF1'><center id='7ACCC22BF1'><tfoot id='7ACCC22BF1'></tfoot></center><abbr id='7ACCC22BF1'><dir id='7ACCC22BF1'><tfoot id='7ACCC22BF1'></tfoot><noframes id='7ACCC22BF1'>

    • <optgroup id='7ACCC22BF1'><strike id='7ACCC22BF1'><sup id='7ACCC22BF1'></sup></strike><code id='7ACCC22BF1'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='7ACCC22BF1'><label id='7ACCC22BF1'><select id='7ACCC22BF1'><dt id='7ACCC22BF1'><span id='7ACCC22BF1'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='7ACCC22BF1'></u>
          <i id='7ACCC22BF1'><strike id='7ACCC22BF1'><tt id='7ACCC22BF1'><pre id='7ACCC22BF1'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          A building with white exterior and glass walls embellished with Guardant Health's logo — coverage from STAT
          Courtesy Guardant Health

          An independent panel of advisers to the Food and Drug Administration recommended the agency approve Guardant Health’s blood-based colon cancer detection test. If the agency follows the recommendation, it will clear an early hurdle for the test’s broader adoption.

          The expert panel spent hours listening to presentations from Guardant, the FDA, and members of the public before voting on the screening test, called Shield. The panel’s nine voting members then voted on whether the test was safe, effective, and whether its benefits outweigh its risks, with eight, six, and seven panelists endorsing those views, respectively.

          advertisement

          FDA approval is a requirement for winning coverage from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which could be the difference between Guardant’s test becoming widespread — or irrelevant. In 2021, CMS denied coverage for Epi proColon, a different blood-based colon cancer test approved by the FDA. Soon after, the test’s maker, Epigenomics, announced that it would stop actively marketing the test, and last year the company announced a restructuring that included layoffs.

          STAT+ Exclusive Story

          Already have an account? Log in

          STAT+

          This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

          Unlock this article — plus daily coverage and analysis of the biotech sector — by subscribing to STAT+.

          Already have an account? Log in

          Already have an account? Log in

          Monthly

          $39

          Totals $468 per year

          $39/month Get Started

          Totals $468 per year

          Starter

          $30

          for 3 months, then $39/month

          $30 for 3 months Get Started

          Then $39/month

          Annual

          $399

          Save 15%

          $399/year Get Started

          Save 15%

          11+ Users

          Custom

          Savings start at 25%!

          Request A Quote Request A Quote

          Savings start at 25%!

          2-10 Users

          $300

          Annually per user

          $300/year Get Started

          $300 Annually per user

          View All Plans

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          fashion