<code id='50783FD055'></code><style id='50783FD055'></style>
    • <acronym id='50783FD055'></acronym>
      <center id='50783FD055'><center id='50783FD055'><tfoot id='50783FD055'></tfoot></center><abbr id='50783FD055'><dir id='50783FD055'><tfoot id='50783FD055'></tfoot><noframes id='50783FD055'>

    • <optgroup id='50783FD055'><strike id='50783FD055'><sup id='50783FD055'></sup></strike><code id='50783FD055'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='50783FD055'><label id='50783FD055'><select id='50783FD055'><dt id='50783FD055'><span id='50783FD055'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='50783FD055'></u>
          <i id='50783FD055'><strike id='50783FD055'><tt id='50783FD055'><pre id='50783FD055'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Illustration of three connected puzzle pieces, with a woman standing near the missing/empty puzzle piece space. -- first opinion coverage from STAT
          Adobe

          Women have always been underrepresented in medical research. A new study reveals that not much has changed, especially when it comes to tests of cardiovascular devices. 

          In a paper published in JAMA Internal Medicine on Monday, researchers found that the percentage of women represented in high-risk medical device trials did not increase from 2010 to 2020. Women generally made up just 33% of participants when the team reviewed 195 trials published from 2016 to 2022. The percentages varied between devices: Women made up 46% of participants in orthopedic trials, but 29% in cardiovascular studies. 

          advertisement

          The issue isn’t new. The government has made some strides in correcting earlier missteps, like the Food and Drug Administration telling researchers in 1977 to exclude women of reproductive potential from early clinical trials. But stakeholders think agencies like the FDA could do more to incentivize the enrollment of women.

          STAT+ Exclusive Story

          Already have an account? Log in

          STAT+

          This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

          Unlock this article — and get additional analysis of the technologies disrupting health care — by subscribing to STAT+.

          Already have an account? Log in

          Already have an account? Log in

          Monthly

          $39

          Totals $468 per year

          $39/month Get Started

          Totals $468 per year

          Starter

          $30

          for 3 months, then $39/month

          $30 for 3 months Get Started

          Then $39/month

          Annual

          $399

          Save 15%

          $399/year Get Started

          Save 15%

          11+ Users

          Custom

          Savings start at 25%!

          Request A Quote Request A Quote

          Savings start at 25%!

          2-10 Users

          $300

          Annually per user

          $300/year Get Started

          $300 Annually per user

          View All Plans

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          Wikipedia