<code id='6BA4D1971B'></code><style id='6BA4D1971B'></style>
    • <acronym id='6BA4D1971B'></acronym>
      <center id='6BA4D1971B'><center id='6BA4D1971B'><tfoot id='6BA4D1971B'></tfoot></center><abbr id='6BA4D1971B'><dir id='6BA4D1971B'><tfoot id='6BA4D1971B'></tfoot><noframes id='6BA4D1971B'>

    • <optgroup id='6BA4D1971B'><strike id='6BA4D1971B'><sup id='6BA4D1971B'></sup></strike><code id='6BA4D1971B'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='6BA4D1971B'><label id='6BA4D1971B'><select id='6BA4D1971B'><dt id='6BA4D1971B'><span id='6BA4D1971B'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='6BA4D1971B'></u>
          <i id='6BA4D1971B'><strike id='6BA4D1971B'><tt id='6BA4D1971B'><pre id='6BA4D1971B'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          A sign that reads "Department of Justice" on its building behind some bushes — insurance coverage from STAT
          Samuel Corum/Getty Images

          The Department of Justice has asked a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Humana, which alleged the government’s new audits of Medicare Advantage plans are unlawful.

          And if the lawsuit isn’t thrown out, the DOJ said in a new legal filing, at a minimum, it should be moved to a different federal court in Texas — away from a judge that has a track record of striking down federal health care laws.

          advertisement

          The DOJ’s main contention with Humana’s lawsuit is that Humana has not been hurt under the new Medicare Advantage audit regulations because those audits haven’t been rolled out yet, and won’t be for a while. But the Biden administration also insinuated in its official response that these new auditing rules are more vague and have less teeth than previously advertised.

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          comprehensive