<code id='6C50ADD137'></code><style id='6C50ADD137'></style>
    • <acronym id='6C50ADD137'></acronym>
      <center id='6C50ADD137'><center id='6C50ADD137'><tfoot id='6C50ADD137'></tfoot></center><abbr id='6C50ADD137'><dir id='6C50ADD137'><tfoot id='6C50ADD137'></tfoot><noframes id='6C50ADD137'>

    • <optgroup id='6C50ADD137'><strike id='6C50ADD137'><sup id='6C50ADD137'></sup></strike><code id='6C50ADD137'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='6C50ADD137'><label id='6C50ADD137'><select id='6C50ADD137'><dt id='6C50ADD137'><span id='6C50ADD137'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='6C50ADD137'></u>
          <i id='6C50ADD137'><strike id='6C50ADD137'><tt id='6C50ADD137'><pre id='6C50ADD137'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          Wikipedia