<code id='23093485FC'></code><style id='23093485FC'></style>
    • <acronym id='23093485FC'></acronym>
      <center id='23093485FC'><center id='23093485FC'><tfoot id='23093485FC'></tfoot></center><abbr id='23093485FC'><dir id='23093485FC'><tfoot id='23093485FC'></tfoot><noframes id='23093485FC'>

    • <optgroup id='23093485FC'><strike id='23093485FC'><sup id='23093485FC'></sup></strike><code id='23093485FC'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='23093485FC'><label id='23093485FC'><select id='23093485FC'><dt id='23093485FC'><span id='23093485FC'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='23093485FC'></u>
          <i id='23093485FC'><strike id='23093485FC'><tt id='23093485FC'><pre id='23093485FC'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          1:03Former President Donald Trump speaks before he boards his plane at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, Aug. 3, 2023, in Arlington, Va., after facing a judge on federal conspiracy charges that allege he conspired to subvert the 2020 election.Alex Brandon/AP

          Special counsel Jack Smith obtained a search warrant for records and data from former President Donald Trump's Twitter account earlier this year, newly revealed court documents show.

          The existence of the search warrant was confirmed in a new order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which has upheld a $350,000 fine against Twitter imposed by a judge in D.C. District Court that found the company in contempt for initially failing to comply with the warrant.

          This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          fashion