<code id='337F6F9E74'></code><style id='337F6F9E74'></style>
    • <acronym id='337F6F9E74'></acronym>
      <center id='337F6F9E74'><center id='337F6F9E74'><tfoot id='337F6F9E74'></tfoot></center><abbr id='337F6F9E74'><dir id='337F6F9E74'><tfoot id='337F6F9E74'></tfoot><noframes id='337F6F9E74'>

    • <optgroup id='337F6F9E74'><strike id='337F6F9E74'><sup id='337F6F9E74'></sup></strike><code id='337F6F9E74'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='337F6F9E74'><label id='337F6F9E74'><select id='337F6F9E74'><dt id='337F6F9E74'><span id='337F6F9E74'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='337F6F9E74'></u>
          <i id='337F6F9E74'><strike id='337F6F9E74'><tt id='337F6F9E74'><pre id='337F6F9E74'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Peter Marks. -- health coverage from STAT
          Peter Marks, Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration. Susan Walsh-Pool/Getty Images

          Peter Marks wants drug developers to ask more stupid questions.

          It’s part of the top Food and Drug Administration official’s plan to reinvigorate gene therapy, a field that has struggled despite significant technological advances. Some companies are shelving programs or going out of business, even when they have promising data. 

          advertisement

          The problems are numerous: The diseases are often exceptionally rare, limiting the potential market. Manufacturing at commercial quality is complex and expensive. Proving a drug works can be difficult, because there may be too few patients to run a traditional randomized study. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          comprehensive