<code id='BF15D2C16E'></code><style id='BF15D2C16E'></style>
    • <acronym id='BF15D2C16E'></acronym>
      <center id='BF15D2C16E'><center id='BF15D2C16E'><tfoot id='BF15D2C16E'></tfoot></center><abbr id='BF15D2C16E'><dir id='BF15D2C16E'><tfoot id='BF15D2C16E'></tfoot><noframes id='BF15D2C16E'>

    • <optgroup id='BF15D2C16E'><strike id='BF15D2C16E'><sup id='BF15D2C16E'></sup></strike><code id='BF15D2C16E'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='BF15D2C16E'><label id='BF15D2C16E'><select id='BF15D2C16E'><dt id='BF15D2C16E'><span id='BF15D2C16E'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='BF15D2C16E'></u>
          <i id='BF15D2C16E'><strike id='BF15D2C16E'><tt id='BF15D2C16E'><pre id='BF15D2C16E'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          fashion