<code id='32AD1FB996'></code><style id='32AD1FB996'></style>
    • <acronym id='32AD1FB996'></acronym>
      <center id='32AD1FB996'><center id='32AD1FB996'><tfoot id='32AD1FB996'></tfoot></center><abbr id='32AD1FB996'><dir id='32AD1FB996'><tfoot id='32AD1FB996'></tfoot><noframes id='32AD1FB996'>

    • <optgroup id='32AD1FB996'><strike id='32AD1FB996'><sup id='32AD1FB996'></sup></strike><code id='32AD1FB996'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='32AD1FB996'><label id='32AD1FB996'><select id='32AD1FB996'><dt id='32AD1FB996'><span id='32AD1FB996'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='32AD1FB996'></u>
          <i id='32AD1FB996'><strike id='32AD1FB996'><tt id='32AD1FB996'><pre id='32AD1FB996'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Influenza A virions
          F. A. Murphy/CDC

          Vir Biotechnology said Thursday that a long-acting antibody drug designed to protect healthy individuals from influenza A failed to do so in a nearly 3,000-person clinical trial.

          Volunteers who received the highest dose of the drug, known as VIR-2482, were only 16% less likely than the placebo group to develop symptomatic influenza A infections, as defined by trial criteria, over a seven-month period. The difference was not statistically significant.

          advertisement

          The results are a setback in broader efforts to develop better protective measures against both seasonal and potential pandemic influenza strains. In the short term, Vir and outside experts hoped VIR-2482 could provide additional annual protection for at-risk groups like older adults, as flu vaccines are often only modestly effective.

          Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

          GET STARTED Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          fashion