<code id='ACDBF92F4E'></code><style id='ACDBF92F4E'></style>
    • <acronym id='ACDBF92F4E'></acronym>
      <center id='ACDBF92F4E'><center id='ACDBF92F4E'><tfoot id='ACDBF92F4E'></tfoot></center><abbr id='ACDBF92F4E'><dir id='ACDBF92F4E'><tfoot id='ACDBF92F4E'></tfoot><noframes id='ACDBF92F4E'>

    • <optgroup id='ACDBF92F4E'><strike id='ACDBF92F4E'><sup id='ACDBF92F4E'></sup></strike><code id='ACDBF92F4E'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='ACDBF92F4E'><label id='ACDBF92F4E'><select id='ACDBF92F4E'><dt id='ACDBF92F4E'><span id='ACDBF92F4E'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='ACDBF92F4E'></u>
          <i id='ACDBF92F4E'><strike id='ACDBF92F4E'><tt id='ACDBF92F4E'><pre id='ACDBF92F4E'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          
          WSS
          Dozens of sickle cells in a whirlpool — coverage from STAT
          Adobe

          Nearly a decade ago, consultants delivered to Rodger Novak a kind of Sears catalog of human malady: 200 pages, listing dozens of different diseases, each annotated with — from a business standpoint — their best and worst attributes. 

          The document was supposed to help Novak, then the chief executive of CRISPR Therapeutics, navigate a pressing quandary. His company, along with two others, were founded to commercialize the new revolutionary gene-editing tool CRISPR-Cas9, which promised to cure numerous genetic diseases. But which should they target first? What was the best proof-of-concept?

          advertisement

          “We looked at anything and everything,” said Novak, who stepped down as CEO in 2017 but remained on the board until this year. 

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          Leave your comment

          Please enter your name
          Please enter your comment

          knowledge